Fed speak 25 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC

Perspectives on the Economy from Susan M. Collins

SPEECH DIGEST

HAWKISH high confidence · 6.4k characters read

Collins frames the labor market as broadly balanced and near full employment, then puts all the policy weight on inflation, which she notes has run above 2 percent for over five years. The headline is the conditionality: she was comfortable holding in July, but says maintaining the current range requires continued evidence inflation is coming down, and absent that evidence it will be appropriate to tighten policy soon. That is an explicit hike option from a centrist voter, not a hold-and-wait.

What’s new: The tightening bias is new and specific. Most of the labor market read (low-hire, low-fire, unemployment just above 4 percent, hiring picking up) is already known. What the market did not have priced from Collins is the phrase that it will be appropriate to tighten policy soon if disinflation does not show through, plus her flagging that the AI build-out is pushing core goods inflation higher and that she is watching a possible reopening of the Strait of Hormuz as a precondition for her base case.

KEY FINDINGS

"Should evidence of sustained inflation progress not materialize, I believe it will be appropriate to tighten policy soon to ensure we deliver price stability in a reasonable time frame." A centrist Reserve Bank president putting hikes on the table shifts the distribution of the next move and should flatten out any easing priced in the front end.
She explicitly raises the risk that firms' price-setting behavior has become inconsistent with 2 percent inflation. That is an expectations-anchoring argument, the kind that justifies tightening independent of the growth data.
Her modal disinflation outlook is conditional on limited additional tariff increases and some reopening of the Strait of Hormuz. Two exogenous triggers that, if they break the wrong way, flip her from hold to hike; energy and tariff headlines now carry Fed reaction-function risk.
The AI build-out is described as putting upward pressure on core goods inflation, and stronger growth is listed as an upside inflation risk. Ties the equity/AI capex cycle directly to the hawkish case, so good growth news is now bad rates news in her framework.
Labor market risks are called two-sided and conditions broadly balanced, with unemployment stable just above 4 percent and limited layoffs. Removes the labor market as a source of near-term easing pressure and leaves inflation as the sole driver of her vote.
June and July inflation reports were called only mildly encouraging, with the caveat that monthly readings are volatile. Sets up the next couple of CPI/PCE prints as the swing factor for whether the hawkish tail gets pulled forward.

FROM THE DOCUMENT

But with inflation still too high, I remain particularly concerned about the price stability portion of the dual mandate.

But for me, maintaining the current federal funds rate target range will require continued evidence that inflation is indeed coming down.

Should evidence of sustained inflation progress not materialize, I believe it will be appropriate to tighten policy soon to ensure we deliver price stability in a reasonable time frame.

With regards to the latter, I’ll note that the AI build-out appears to be putting upward pressure on core goods inflation.

Before heading to the Federal Reserve’s annual symposium at Jackson Hole, Wyoming, I have been meeting with stakeholders in the economy from across New England, the Boston Fed’s region – hearing their experiences and sharing my take on current conditions and monetary policy. And, as always, monitoring a great deal of economic data. I am pleased to share a summary of my views in this Perspectives . Overall, I see recent economic activity as expanding at a near-trend pace and labor market conditions as broadly consistent with maximum or full employment, one part of the Fed’s dual mandate. But with inflation still too high, I remain particularly concerned about the price stability portion of the dual mandate. Labor market conditions have been stable, with the unemployment rate just above 4 percent and fluctuating within a narrow range since mid-2024. Layoffs continue to be limited, and initial unemployment-insurance claims remain at the lower end of the range seen since 2022. While volatile from month to month, hiring has picked up relative to late 2025 and become somewhat more broad-based across industries. Of course, the aggregate data mask significant variation across place, occupa

Please note, these views are my own and may not reflect the views of colleagues at the Board of Governors, on the Federal Open Market Committee, or at other Reserve Banks. Before heading to the Federal Reserve’s annual symposium at Jackson Hole, Wyoming, I have been meeting with stakeholders in the economy from across New England, the Boston Fed’s region – hearing their experiences and sharing my take on current conditions and monetary policy. And, as always, monitoring a great deal of economic data. I am pleased to share a summary of my views in this Perspectives. Overall, I see recent economic activity as expanding at a near-trend pace and labor market conditions as broadly consistent with maximum or full employment, one part of the Fed’s dual mandate. But with inflation still too high, I remain particularly concerned about the price stability portion of the dual mandate.

Read the full Fed speech at the source →